(415)552-9060
Can My Landlord Make Me Pay To Replace The Carpet?

Can My Landlord Make Me Pay To Replace The Carpet?

Can My Landlord Make Me Pay To Replace The Carpet?

When we moved in, our landlord warned us that the carpet ‘easily stains’ so we must take our shoes off. We do but after two years of living there, the carpet is definitely worn down.

Now she claims that the carpet should not be so dirty & that our upstairs neighbor has the same carpet that is very clean. We also have had a few accidents which we know we are responsible for- a few burn marks & a nail polish stain. The landlord is claiming that because of how dirty the carpet is in addition to the marks, we will be responsible for replacing the entire apartment because she does not want ‘seams’!

If the carpet is thoroughly cleaned when we move out, and all that remain are the few marks we are responsible for, can she make us replace the entire carpeting?

Ah, carpets…one of the big three, along with hardwood floors and ovens. If all landlords are attracted to a dirty ovens like Sylvia Plath, they become vengeful Aladdins when they suspect that tenants have diminished the magic of the wall-to-wall.

Carpets and drapes – “useful life” rule

Ordinary wear and tear to carpets, drapes and other furnishings cannot be charged against a tenant’s security deposit. (Civil Code Section 1950.5(e).) Ordinary wear and tear includes simple wearing down of carpet and drapes because of normal use or aging, and includes moderate dirt or spotting. In contrast, large rips or indelible stains justify a deduction from the tenant’s security deposit for repairing the carpet or drapes, or replacing them if that is reasonably necessary.

One common method of calculating the deduction for replacement prorates the total cost of replacement so that the tenant pays only for the remaining useful life of the item that the tenant has damaged or destroyed.

The dispositive question one must ask is, “How old is the carpet?” That’s important because carpets don’t last forever.

How do you determine the approximate age of your carpet?

The landlord inadvertently tipped you off that the carpet would be a problem when you moved in. At that point, you should have casually asked the landlord when the carpet had been installed. Generally, tenants should ask this type of question before moving in and take comprehensive photos of a unit before they unload their furniture.

If you are planning to have the carpet professionally cleaned, you have another opportunity to get an estimate of the carpet’s age—ask the carpet cleaner. If you can, get them to sign a letter or declaration stating their opinion about the condition and age of the carpet. If the cleaner is reluctant, either find someone else who will attest to the carpet’s age or ask them to simply note it on the invoice—”Steam clean 50 year old shag carpet, with special raking of Acapulco Gold and Windowpane residue.

How can you calculate the useful life of carpets?

Landlords are allowed to deduct the annual depreciation of items like appliances and carpets from gross income for tax purposes.

IRS Tax Publication 527 provides information regarding expense deductions, including allowable depreciation schedules, for residential rental property. Table 2-1 on page 9 of the publication shows allowable depreciation of property used in rental activities. Using the general depreciation system carpets have a usable life of 5 years. Using the alternative depreciation system, carpets have a usable life of 9 years. (IRS Tax Publication 527, page 9, Table 2-1.) Most landlords use the general depreciation system.

For example, suppose a tenant has truly damaged a carpet beyond ordinary wear and tear (hard to prove), an eight-year-old carpet that had a life expectancy of five years would be worth nothing, zero, zip, nada. The landlord has to eat the replacement cost despite the damage beyond ordinary ware and tear.

Using the same example, with a life expectancy of nine years and if a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost $2,000, the landlord could properly charge only $222.22 for only one years’ worth of life (use) that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet.

In your case, we know that the carpet was not new when you moved in. Assuming that the carpet is three years old, and the small marks to which you refer do not constitute ordinary wear and tear (highly unlikely), you could be liable for 40% of the replacement cost of a similar carpet.

This isn’t legal advice, but I’ve repaired carpets myself. One can do things like carefully trimming off the burned top of the pile on the carpet. Or, cutting out a little piece of the carpet in a closet and gluing it in a small stained area that one has carefully removed like a hair plug. I’m talking small area here, like at most an half an inch square. Don’t try to replace the blood stains from a Goodfellas-style beat down.

Ask an expert. There are plenty of tricks to repair carpet that won’t involve a security deposit deduction.

Make sure you take photos when you move out. If the landlord attempts to deduct from your security deposit, go to the San Francisco Tenants Union to discuss how you can sue her for maximum damages.

Finally, ask yourself, “What kind of landlord would install carpets in a rental unit that easily stain except a Cheese Ball who charges her tenants to pay for replacement every time they move out?” A Cheese Ball who pockets the cost, doesn’t replace the carpets, and still deducts the depreciation from her taxes, that’s who.

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060

Grand Theft Security Deposit Again?

Grand Theft Security Deposit Again?

Grand Theft Security Deposit Again?

I recently moved into a rent controlled building in SF.  During the application process, an erroneous community judgement appeared on my credit report, and despite my showing it had been removed from my other two reports by the respective reporting agencies, I was required to pay double the normal deposit amount.

Ten business days later, I have received notification from the 3rd and final reporting agency that the error was permanently deleted without equivocation and requested my management company apply the excess portion of my security deposit toward a month’s rent.

They are refusing, without explanation, despite over-charging me on the deposit based on information proven to be false.  Do I have any recourse before the end of my lease term to be reimbursed for this additional amount?  This is not instilling me with confidence that they will employ fair practices upon my move out regarding returning my deposit overall.

Why would you ever have any confidence that a landlord will return your security deposit?

A report complied by Tenants Together entitled No Deterrent: Improper Security Deposit Withholding in California states:  “[I]in excess of $1 billion of deposit money annually is either returned to or withheld from California tenants.” The report also found that 60% of tenants reported that they had experienced unfair withholding of some or all of their deposit. It’s fair to say that hundreds of millions of dollars a year are flat out stolen by landlords.

Yet, as Dean Preston wrote last year, after our legislative griftocrats failed to pass a law enacting minor reforms to the security deposit statute (California  Civil Code section 1950.5), the California Senate denied tenants basic protections that Alabama tenants have.

If you rent an unfurnished apartment, your security deposit cannot exceed twice the monthly rent or three times the monthly rent for a furnished unit. (Civil Code §1950.5(c).) That’s why landlords typically collect a total of three times the rent upon signing a lease (first month’s rent plus maximum security deposit.)

If the management company has collected more than the legal amount, demand that the excess be returned and threaten to sue if it is not returned immediately.

Civil Code §1950.5(l) states in part:

The bad faith claim or retention by a landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest of the security or any portion thereof in violation of this section […] may subject the landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest to statutory damages of up to twice the amount of the security, in addition to actual damages. The court may award damages for bad faith whenever the facts warrant that award, regardless of whether the injured party has specifically requested relief. In an action under this section, the landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest shall have the burden of proof as to the reasonableness of the amounts claimed or the authority pursuant to this section to demand additional security deposits.

Usually this part of the statute is applicable to lawsuits for unreturned deposits after a tenant has vacated, but I don’t see why it couldn’t be used in your case, if the landlord collected too much money at the outset of your tenancy.

FYI, one of Mark Leno’s proposed revisions to the security deposit law last year simply changed “The court may award damages for bad faith…” to “The court must award damages for bad faith…” In this example, a court has already found bad faith, why shouldn’t it be required to punish that bad faith? Could it be that bad faith is standard operating procedure for landlords?

No Deterrent reported that tenants prevailed in over 70% of the cases that went to judgment, yet in only 3.5% of the security deposit cases filed by tenants was a landlord assessed a penalty by the court. Landlords steal hundreds of million of dollars from tenants every year and get away with it, aided and abetted by our so-called representatives who will not cross their real estate industry/landlord masters, despite a showing of bad faith–grand theft.

Of course, if the landlord collected an amount that falls within the legal limit, you will have to wait till the end of your tenancy to sue them…and yes, given their behavior now, you will have to sue them. Reread “Grand Theft Security Deposit” for a list of actions to take to avoid losing your deposit at the end of your tenancy.

Note on the image: I found this image on the web almost five years ago. It was a nineteenth century image of a kid picking a rich dandy’s pocket. I contacted my friend, the artist Francis McIlveen, to retool the image to show the dandy picking the kid’s pocket to illustrate my first “Grand Theft Security Deposit” post. It’s still apropos. The rich still steal from our children and landlords still steal security deposits from tenants.

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060

Do I Have to Use The Crappy Furniture That Came With My Apartment?

Do I Have to Use The Crappy Furniture That Came With My Apartment?

Do I Have to Use The Crappy Furniture That Came With My Apartment?

Crappy furniture.

I am a tenant in lower Nob Hill, building is more than 50 years old.  I live in a studio apartment that I signed a 6 month lease for in July of 2011.  The apartment came sparsely furnished with a futon bed (now removed because it was broken), a T.V./bookcase wooden thing, that probably dates back to the 70’s and a small table that is filthy, stained and ewwwwww.  

I want to remove the furniture and move my own in.  I wasn’t sure about how long I would be here, so the sorta furnished deal was appealing at the time I moved in.  Now that I know I will be here a few more years, I’d like to bring my stuff up from down south.  

The furniture is not worth anything and Goodwill and DAV will not take it because it is in too rough of shape.  

The landlord has threatened me with lawsuits and eviction stating to move furniture out would be a “serious crime”.  I have assured him that I will leave the apartment in better condition than what it was rented to me, but I was set on getting rid of the useless furniture.  

I have searched high and low for some kind of law or statute about this and I cannot find one.  I don’t mind giving up my deposit, which was 600 bucks.

The best solution to this problem would be to stash the furniture in a closet until you move. I’m guessing that may not be an option for you because the apartment is a studio. I also get that the cost of storing worthless furniture is a waste of money.

The first place to look to resolve, or at least understand how to deal with issues like this, is your lease. Check it carefully to see if it defines your obligations with respect to the firewood in your apartment. Look for specific clauses regarding the furnishings. Then read more general clauses that limit or prohibit alterations and repairs to the unit.

Read the lease as broadly as possible to see if any language that could be applied to removing the furniture could be used to evict you for breach of contract. Given his absurd claim that removing the furniture would be a serious crime, your landlord (or his lawyer) will be reading the lease the same way. Make sure the landlord cannot evict you for breach of the lease.

Next, make sure that the table isn’t a Federal inlay mahogany card table made by John and Thomas Seymour for which the landlord paid $30.00 now valued at $400,000 or that the T.V. bookcase thing isn’t an original Stickley.

As you already guessed, if you aren’t in breach of an obligation under the lease, removing the furniture is a security deposit issue. California Civil Code section 1950.5(b)(4) states that a deposit may be used by the landlord “to remedy future defaults by the tenant in any obligation under the rental agreement to restore, replace, or return personal property or appurtenances, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, if the security deposit is authorized to be applied thereto by the rental agreement.”

You need to remind your landlord that you’re not committing any crime, he cannot evict you, and if he sues you in small claims court he will lose because he can’t prove any damages if the furniture has no value.

You can also tell him that he can use the deposit to replace the furniture in case he still wants to rent the apartment as furnished. Point out that this is a good deal for him because he can find replacement furniture on the street, just like he did the first time.

Then take lots of photos of the furniture before you toss it. The photos should be so detailed that one can smell the 70s. Ewwwwww!

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060

“What Lie Can We Get Away With This Month?”

“What Lie Can We Get Away With This Month?”

“What Lie Can We Get Away With This Month?”

As we’re getting ready to move out of the house, the landlady is saying “there’s no deposit” because 2 years ago a tenant who doesn’t live here anymore asked to pay reduced rent over a couple months. Landlady agreed and never said or put anything in writing to anyone about wanting the back rent repaid until now, two years later. Isn’t she supposed to request repayment within one year?

I’ve received a couple of questions similar to yours in the last month or so. I also spoke to a tenant on the telephone about a landlord who claimed she couldn’t refund a security deposit for exactly the same reason. Different landlords, different tenants. What’s up?

Sometimes I wonder if there’s a “What Lies Can We Get Away With This Month?” working group of the Simple Minded Apartment Association of San Francisco. But that would be paranoid wouldn’t it?

Because landlords are not required to deposit security deposits in separate accounts, they’ve already spent your money. Landlords have forgotten about your security deposit. Why haven’t you? It comes as no surprise that a new lie to justify withholding a security deposit would surface from the landlords’ collective subconscious. This seems to be the bullshit du jour.

Fortunate for you that this merde doesn’t bake well.

California Civil Code §1950.5(k)(1) states in part: “In any action under this section, the landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest shall have the burden of proof as to the reasonableness of the amounts claimed or the authority pursuant to this section to demand additional security deposits.”

Absent an agreement or other written proof, the landlord cannot meet her burden to prove that her “deduction” ever took place.

I am not aware of any requirement to request payment in a year. You may be confused with the requirement that a three-day notice to pay or quit can only demand rent going back one year.

When you write your demand letter, remind the landlord that she could be liable for statutory damages of twice the amount of the original security deposit for her bad faith claim.

Permit me to rant for a moment. Earlier this year State Senator Mark Leno introduced a bill (SB 603) to amend the security deposit law to include, among other things two issues I’ve noted here. It would have required landlords to keep security deposit in separate accounts and to pay interest on the amounts. It would have also required that a court must award statutory damages with a finding of a bad faith claim or retention of a security deposit. The current law says “may” and statutory damages are only assessed in about 3.5% of cases. The bill was defeated by Democrats! I can go on and on about fucking Democrats. Suffice it to say that Democrats are not necessarily tenant-friendly.

If landlords know they can lie to their tenants and the court about retaining a security deposit and only get a slap on the wrist, why wouldn’t they lie? Look out for more excretum tauri.

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060

Can My Landlord Keep My Deposit Because He Wants To Replace The Range Hood?

Can My Landlord Keep My Deposit Because He Wants To Replace The Range Hood?

Can My Landlord Keep My Deposit Because He Wants To Replace The Range Hood?

My landlord is trying to hold all of my deposit and charge me even above the security deposit by replacing the range hood in the kitchen and cleaning the ceiling and walls in the kitchen due to excessive oil.

We’ve hired a professional cleaning company to clean the whole house, maybe these spots are not in very good condition even after cleaning. Should we pay for that?

We’ve been living there for more than 7 years.

He also charged me for painting of $1500 for the whole house because of the kid’s drawing on the wall on the first floor.

Should I pay for that? Or just a percentage of that since I’ve been living there for a long time?

BTW, I live in San Jose.

Whenever I write about security deposits, my comments can be applied to any tenant in California because state law governs the collection and return of security deposits. Almost all of my answers are based on my reading and interpretation of California Civil Code §1950.5, which applies to all California tenancies from Weed to Chula Vista, even San Jose.

San Francisco tenants enjoy an additional local right to collect interest on their security deposits, but they’re still governed by Civil Code §1950.5 for everything else.

The first thing you should do id re-read “Grand Theft Security Deposit.” Then take a at a recent column in which I addresses a common problem–the landlord uses the tenant’s money to remodel. Check out “Tenant Troubles: Can My Landlord Make Me Pay To Replace The Carpet?”

Civil Code §1950.5 provides that a landlord can deduct from a security deposit, costs associated with repairing damages that are over and above those associated with ordinary wear and tear. Unless you took a sledge hammer to the range hood, the landlord cannot blame you because the hood needs to be replaced. In fact, you can point out that any excess grease was caused by the defective hood if it wasn’t ventilating properly.

If some areas in the house just cannot be cleaned they also may simply be the result of ordinary wear and tear.

The kid’s drawing is another issue. Certainly the landlord can deduct any cost associated with repainting that wall, but I don’t believe he can justify painting the whole house.

The landlord is required by law to provide you with a list of deductions. If you feel they are unfair, write a letter to the landlord and demand that he return the portion to which you are entitled. Give him five days to return the money and tell him if he does not do so you will sue him for your actual damages plus twice the amount fo the security deposit for withholding your money in bad faith.

When the landlord does not respond, file a small claims lawsuit against him. Pick up a copy of Everybody’s Guide to Small Claims Court in California, by Ralph Warner for Nolo Press. This book will guide you, step by step, through the process.

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060

My Absentee Master Tenant Was Scamming Me And My Landlord

My Absentee Master Tenant Was Scamming Me And My Landlord

My Absentee Master Tenant Was Scamming Me And My Landlord

So in December 2011 I started living in an apt with 3 other girls in SF. Lo and behold I found out that the man who we were paying our rent to was the master tenant not an actual landlord and that he actually lived in San Diego. So since he was there he designated one of the roommates as his spokesperson. She kept in contact with him about any problems with the apartment was in charge of finding new roommates etc. She told me that the way deposits work is that the new roommate writes the deposit out to the old roommate that moves out and whenever I move out the same would be done for me. I have this all in writing in my original rental agreement that I was given.

Now at the end of July 2012 I ended up moving to Chicago for my job. When I asked his “spokesperson” about when I would receive my deposit back she told me that it wasn’t her responsibility and for me to deal with the master tenant. When I did he told her no its your (his spokesperson) job since you deal with the apartment’s business. I have not heard from her since then. In fact she ended up abandoning the apt without notice and supposedly no one has seen her since. It has been almost 3 months and I still do not have my deposit.

I have been in constant contact with the master tenant and he constantly says that he hasn’t heard anything from the landlord and that he doesn’t know what to do. I felt bad for him until I received a forwarded letter in Chicago about a landlords petition where we (I was still included on the list even though i moved out already) were supposed to show up to a court hearing. All of our names were included even though it was dated almost 2 months after I left. Clearly the landlord is not sitting idly by. I brought it up to the master tenant and he says he had no idea and never received a notice (although his address included with his name on the petition was the same address we mailed our checks to.)

Since then I have contacted the SF Rent Board and was told I had the right to bring the master tenant to small claims court. When I brought it up to him in a very civil manner (I even gave him until the end of the month and have the email as proof!) he responded very nasty saying that I could bring him to court but he wouldn’t ever pay me so what good would that do and that I didn’t pay the deposit to him so what could I possibly do to him.

I find it hard to believe that somebody that is not doing all that he can to get us our deposit back is able to just do that with no sort of consequence. What can I do?

I find it hard to believe that you can actually muster up some concern for this sociopath after he blatantly ripped you off.

Before I tell you that your chances of recovering your security deposit are only slightly better than Mitt Zomney’s chances of winning last night’s election, you should call the Rent Board again and find out if decision was made on the landlord’s petition and get a copy of that decision.

I think the landlord probably discovered that the master tenant did not live in the unit and was likely making a profit on the rent by overcharging the roommates. The landlord probably filed a petition under Rent Board Rules & Regulations §1.21 alleging his right to increase the rent to market rate based upon the fact that the master tenant did not reside in the unit.

I’ve written about this issue several times. See, for example, “Tenant Troubles: Why An Absentee Master Tenant Is A Bad Idea” and “Bad Master Tenant.”

Simply put, your ex-master tenant is a liar. He received the notice from the Rent Board and he never talked to the landlord about getting your money.

Essentially a landlord can collect a security deposit at the inception of the tenancy, when the tenant or tenants sign a lease. The deposit is held, as security against damage, nonpayment of rent, etc. Even if roommates come and go, the landlord does not have to return the security deposit until the tenancy ends, until a new lease is signed with, presumably, new tenants. The building owner/landlord has no duty to return your portion of the security deposit.

The master tenant knew this. He would never jeopardize his little enterprise by contacting the landlord for you.

It is also likely that the lease provided that he had to seek the landlord’s permission to sublet. Do think he did that? You’re actually lucky that weren’t named in an unlawful detainer (eviction lawsuit). I recommend that you contact the real landlord and inform him that you moved out in July just in case he decides to evict the rest of the roommates.

Normally I would advise you to sue ’em all and let the court sort it out. But master tenants rarely have assets or jobs that you can lien and/or attach. That’s why they set up these schemes in the first place. To complicate matters, the roommate/manager (thief number 2) absconded with your security deposit and you don’t know where she is to be able to serve her with a summons to appear in Small Claims Court.

You don’t mention the amount of your deposit, nor do you say if you still live in Chicago. Each of those factors should be considered before you file a claim. Will the amount of the security deposit justify flying back to California to present your case when it’s likely you’ll be suing two deadbeats?

If you want to find out more about the small claims process read Everybody’s Guide to Small Claims Court from Nolo Press.

Sweet Jesus, Mary and Joseph! Tenants: Never, ever rent a room from an absentee master tenant!

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060

Do I Have To Give My Landlord My Pot Rack?

Do I Have To Give My Landlord My Pot Rack?

Do I Have To Give My Landlord My Pot Rack?

I rent a single-family house in SF and gave 30-day notice to vacate.

My question is about the pot rack I installed in the kitchen. It was attached to a 2×4 that I screwed to the wall and then I screwed the pot rack to that. The Landlord said it is not allowed in my lease therefore it is now part of the house.

The landlord said the same thing applies to the towel rack and curtain rods that are screwed into the walls.

I want to keep my things. Can I fix the holes and expect my security deposit ($2500) back? What right do I have? What right does the landlord have?

Must be a great pot rack…at least your landlord thinks so. That’s why he wants it. The landlord’s rationale to steal your pot rack has been employed by the rich and powerful and two-year-olds for eons–I want it, so now it’s mine and here’s a rule I just made up to justify my keeping it.

Your landlord’s interpretation of the law is self-serving and illogical. Using his reasoning, does that mean that your dog, Brian, stays with the house because there is a “no pets” clause on the lease? Well, that may be a stretch unless the talking dog is tacked to the wall, but you can see what I mean. If the pot rack was an unwarranted alteration in violation of the lease, your landlord should have demanded that you remove it.

To be fair, your landlord is misstating a concept that applies to the sale of a house. If something is attached to the house like a light fixture or a pot rack it can be considered a fixture that must be sold with the house.

Say I’m a prospective purchaser. I view the house and love the pot rack. In fact I love the pot rack so much, I’m willing to spend an extra $100,000 on the place. (I’m a typical, irrational, San Francisco buyer with loads of Twitter dough.) I purchase the house and when I move in, the pot rack is gone. I have the right to claim the pot rack as a fixture and sue the seller. Of course, had your landlord been the seller, he would have removed the pot rack and installed it in his own kitchen before he put the house on the market.

California Civil Code §1950.5(a)(2) states that a landlord can deduct money from a tenant’s security deposit for “the repair of damages to the premises, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, caused by the tenant or by a guest or licensee of the tenant,” not for an unwarranted alteration.

If the pot rack was your addition to the kitchen, take it down, remove the 2X4 and carefully repair any holes left in the walls. You should also touch up and/or repaint the affected wall with the exact, original paint color. You can take a paint chip to a paint store and get a match.

Either that, or offer to sell the pot rack to the landlord.

If you replaced old towel racks and curtain rods with new racks and rods, you should have saved the old ones to reinstall.

The “fixture” rule does apply to items you removed and replaced. You cannot leave a hole in the wall where you substituted a light fixture, but failed to save the old one to reinstall. Same with curtain rods and towel racks. You cannot leave a blank wall, even completely repaired, if there was something on the wall that was included in your original lease.

Frankly, sometimes it’s easier. less time-consuming and less expensive to leave items like curtain rods and towel racks. That is, unless you installed some Pottery Barn racks that set you back half a month’s rent.

Take photos of questionable areas before you move.

If the landlord keeps your security deposit and you sue him in Small Claims Court, imagine a scenario in which the judge asks the landlord two questions. Did the house come with a pot rack? Is the area where the pot rack damaged in any way? If the judge fails to ask those questions, request that she ask them.

If you are considering suing the landlord, take your documentation to the San Francisco Tenants Union and ask them to advise you how to proceed.

Call the Tenant Lawyers now for a free consultation.
(415) 552-9060